Price fixing is illegal under the Competition Act when multiple parties agree on price. Which option expresses this idea correctly?

Study for the UBC Real Estate Exam. Access flashcards and multiple choice questions with hints and explanations. Enhance your preparation and ensure success!

Multiple Choice

Price fixing is illegal under the Competition Act when multiple parties agree on price. Which option expresses this idea correctly?

Explanation:
Pricing agreements among competitors, where several parties agree on a set price, are a form of collusion that the Competition Act treats as illegal. This practice removes price competition, harms consumers, and distorts markets, which is why it’s prohibited. The statement that captures this idea correctly notes that price fixing is illegal when multiple parties agree on a price. Government consent does not make price fixing legal; anti-competitive agreements are generally not allowed even with such consent. Price fixing is not limited to just two companies; it can involve any number of market players who agree on price. Real estate markets are not exempt from competition law—anti-competitive conduct can occur there as well.

Pricing agreements among competitors, where several parties agree on a set price, are a form of collusion that the Competition Act treats as illegal. This practice removes price competition, harms consumers, and distorts markets, which is why it’s prohibited. The statement that captures this idea correctly notes that price fixing is illegal when multiple parties agree on a price.

Government consent does not make price fixing legal; anti-competitive agreements are generally not allowed even with such consent. Price fixing is not limited to just two companies; it can involve any number of market players who agree on price. Real estate markets are not exempt from competition law—anti-competitive conduct can occur there as well.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy